First check on C14 question, no answer

Me to Anthony at Voxpopnews
who claims to have a past as physics teacher

10/16/17 at 10:21 AM

with 0.39 milliSievert per year, atmosphere gets 1.441 % of present atmospheric C14 ratio renewed in 120 years, right?

If at a certain time in the past - before reaching present ratio of C14 to C12 - the production of C14 (supposing now same amount of C12) was twice as fast, like producing C14 at 2.882 % of present C14 in 120 years, was the cosmic radiation:

• 0.78 milliSievert per year?
• 1.56 milliSievert per year?
• 0.55 milliSievet per year?
• depends on total background radiation at ground level as well, not just cosmic one for atmospheric higher strata?

The reason I ask is, I have all along my research into the matter* been presuming, 2.882 % of present carbon being produced in 120 years take double doze of cosmic radiation - not square doubled or root doubled, but doubled. And that background radiation at ground, while a health issue for us, is negligible as to what happens where C14 is in the main produced.

I just noted, you have been teaching physics.

What are you saying about this?

Hans Georg Lundahl

* Not this matter I am asking you, but whether a carbon rise from very low at Flood to 100 % present level by 500 BC would involve so much radiation life could not have survived.

A week later

no answer